I mentioned, in my previous post, my (now confirmed) hypothesis that what I’m calling “subjugation” is one of Joscelin’s ways of submissively loving me, and one of the ways he fears that I don’t understand/appreciate/desire/reciprocate. What I mean by “subjugation” – and this is crucial to why I think he thinks I don’t get it as a kind of love – is something in which I am perceived as distant, alien, and possessed of my own, unknowable motivations.
I may not be accurately describing anything that he actually feels, mind you. I’m guessing a bit blindly, though he seemed to confirm what I was saying yesterday.
I don’t think empathy is the only way to understand another’s feelings, but it’s certainly a starting point. What I want, really badly, is for Jos to describe this feeling to me, to tell me what it’s like for him. What does it feel like? What thoughts go along with it, encourage it? What kinds of thoughts are anathema to it, or don’t fit into its worldview? I want the goods.
When I imagine feeling what I imagine he feels towards someone, I get something that I don’t think is what he’s talking about. The dominant who is tormenting me from an emotional distance is either someone I really don’t care about, in which case I am bottoming and not really thinking or feeling about that other person at all, but just absorbed in my own experience, or, if I were close to the person and experienced this kind of alienation, I think it would be like Violacious described in her comment, frightening and possibly damaging.
In the first case, it’s definitely not a form of love, and in the second case, it’s the kind of love that would break and harm me – a helpless love opening a black hole of need within me.
When we switch and Jos really hurts me, then…what do I feel? I don’t feel deep intimacy, generally, nor am I kind of ignoring him the way I might with someone I just met and am having a scene with at the club. I like when he seems stern and tormenting. I feel submissive to him in those moments. But I don’t think I feel ruthlessly subjugated in the way that I’m talking about here. I don’t feel like there is no mercy for me in the universe, or like I am the plaything of an overlord.
What I feel in those moments is the reciprocal of what I feel when I’m really deliberately hurting Joscelin – either mindless sensation, or a feeling that he’s making me endure something that I have to go through for some reason. (That’s one of my kinks, if you recall – a kind of caretaking while hurting someone. Like a nurse, trainer, or priest who has to do something painful to you for your own good. Mmm, hot.)
Clearly there are times when we play (me on top) where I am doing that nurse/trainer/priest hurting-you-for-your-own-good thing to Joscelin, comforting him while I hurt him, and on his side he’s being tormented as a plaything for my (unempathized-with) pleasure. That seems fine to me – his view is more or less what’s actually happening, after all. The fact that my compassionate act is part of the torment is all right, since it really is an act.
I don’t know. There are a million lenses through which to view what we do, to conceptualize something that is really about feelings and experiences in the moment, and that often involves an altered headspace anyway. But I really do hope that Jos will sit down and tell me about his feelings, in as much detail as he can muster.
9 responses so far ↓
Brian // 12 October 2009 at 7:00 pm
What kind of priests are these, exactly???
violacious // 12 October 2009 at 7:53 pm
Hope you don’t mind, but I had a go at this too.
I’m really curious to hear more about this from Joscelin’s point of view.
devastatingyet // 12 October 2009 at 9:29 pm
Your post was amazing.
Ranat // 15 October 2009 at 8:14 pm
I now lazily copy-paste my comment over at violacious’. :)
I read this post on this the other day, and felt really weird for not understanding what was going on, and now I’ve read vilacious’ post, and I’m still stumped. This is very bizarre for me. I am reading this, and it is *interesting,* but I have no idea what it means.
If I change ’subjugation’ to ’subjugating’ my automatic response is ‘hot,’ in that kind of roleplay kind of way. But I don’t think that’s the way you two are discussing it.
I’m still not sure what subjugation means in this context. I think I understand what Josc and violacious are saying about its meaning to them, but not what it *is.* Could you give examples? I’m not big on acts defining paradigms, but in this instance I think it might help me understand.
devastatingyet // 15 October 2009 at 9:45 pm
Heh, funny. I’ll try to tell you what I mean by it, though I’m also eager to read Violacious’s answer, which of course might differ.
When I say “subjugation” I mean some kind of fairly ruthless dominance that isn’t touchy-feely. Like the other day when I chained Jos up and left him near my feet to writhe in discomfort while I played video games and watched TV.
I was really talking about a feeling on his side, to begin with, but I think you can get there through actions.
Beating someone without talking nice to them might be another subjugation type of thing. Or insisting in a steely manner that they endure something.
That’s what comes to my mind, anyway.
seraglioletters // 17 October 2009 at 7:49 pm
When I think of subjugation, I think of the time R. told me, leeringly, “You’ll be locked in my dungeon and punished. FOREVER.” Wha? Like, punished once is hot. Punished forever with no prospect of any lovey-dovey stuff is like, subjugation. Am I close? (Insert bound forever, hurt forever, whatever; I don’t mean this to turn on the punishment aspect of things.)
seraglioletters // 17 October 2009 at 7:49 pm
Oh duh, you just said it. “Beating someone without talking nice to them.” Yeah, that.
Bedtime! :D
pastrychef // 18 October 2009 at 9:04 am
Dominance usually includes some aspect of being mean because the submissive desires it, and contains an emotional connection. Subjugation seems to involve the removal of the emotional connection-”I’m doing this because I want to and because I can. You will deal with it.” Easy to see where that might be appealing to a submissive-an extreme sport version. Knowing what can be endured for love, as it were, and what can be endured for its own sake-having no outside influence to draw upon. It could be framed as similar to being tortured for vital information; holding up is a test of inner fortitude.
Ranat // 3 November 2009 at 8:22 pm
I had completely forgotten I left this comment.
I think I understand a little bit better, but I am still slightly mystified. I guess what people here have described as subjugation I can’t really imagine except in the context of roleplay, in which case it has set limits of time. Even if I *say* you will be hurt forever and ever, it’s not actually going to be that way, and there will be snuggling afterwards. Then again, having never experienced that, I have no idea what would actually happen for me.